always mentioned, that our freedom ends where the other begins, but actually practiced this sentence? Indeed societies around the globe show treatment of mutual respect and gratitude to others? And taking people as equal and alike? (The same is not so ridiculous, but as they treat each other). is perfect in theory the above statement, more in the prácatica (which is where it really counts) is an entirely different matter. Let's take an example, the government tries to make us believe that with new laws, reforms and proposals, support companies (or business) trying to outdo small and achieve a better standard of living, however, leaders contradict themselves because they are owners of several mega companies that see any indication of future competition, quickly take measures to crush them and leave them in bankruptcy and get to have an absolute monopoly. Here is one of the undesirable and unavoidable CONSEQUENCES of the principle of free enterprise and trade, growing constantly human misery.
This at an economic level, but when we got even more personal level, a purely social level, which likewise violate the same rights and where people are treated badly, people swear by it happens to them is just, normal, either by religious beliefs (major causes) political colors, extreme hobbies, etc. For example, in a Muslim village, where almost everything is strongly suppressed, and every day, in our view is
commit injustices against women are disrespected, even to the point of stoned for acts "unclean" committed, as simply unable to uncover the face, how other even more absurd.
Another situation in which we attacked the other stupidly, is the extreme nationalism that glorifies the sense of ownership in large measure, because not only are believed to have objects or even people land but also to the landscape! The inconsistent said "here are like" or "roots of our land," anti-definition shows us Are we plant? Do not have the capacity to mobilize? We can travel, enjoy, walk around, wander, do not have a stem that we stick to a certain place, we the ability to cross boundaries, learn, observe and live.
not commented in an extremist, but I just want to show how many times refuse hospitality to a stranger, almost automatically block appreciation to others, exchange of human dignity ... because from time have told stories and ancient myths, where the gods called inn to check on the kindness of humans.
Interestingly, in the movie "I, Robot," based on the work of writer Isaac Asimov, sets out three basic rules of living together with robots, with humans, which, paradoxically, we serve us well:
1) There will harm any human being.
2) help when you can to humans (as does not violate the first rule).
3) Keep your own existence (as we will fail the first two rules).
Simple rules that if everyone followed cambaiaría radically our daily lives and significantly improve mutual dignity is a true human freedom msotraría limited by justice, would be "civil" not idiots or robots (still them some times are better than ourselves.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment