A recipe of my grandmother ... Parasite and a recipe, his great-granddaughter.
China, Turkey, Thailand, Spain, England, Russia, Malassya, Italy, France, UK, USA, Japan, Germany, Holland, Korea, Sweden ...
have to see what they give to it the "made in" a house!
At the moment it would have to publish the PQ10, but corresponds to an eight-part work is not finished due to poor acceptance was the fourth. There is, however, have not been published but never, until the seventh.
For this reason we publish today PQ11 which, in turn, was a controversial article as it became a forum where some people were supporters of psychoanalysis to a level of fanaticism. In it some unintended errors and others that if they are and therefore make the text is somewhat biased, however, from point of view of a thought exercise, think it might be a good help for my readers.
Psychoanalysis: A lie uncomfortable (PQ11)
Within the series PQ introduce an old story that I made as an exercise in the courses lectured in personal development techniques. Only a marginal work, along with others, helped me to give reasons that these techniques had been disabled, other colleagues did some work much better than this forcing me to apologize about the quality obviously improved, however, at a technical level, won the highest score. We now know much more about the brain and mind that when psychoanalysis was born, but also to learn more and more questions have come to our knowledge has evolved Socratic: the more we acquire greater awareness of our ignorance. This has not removed the value of psychoanalysis, as expected, but if it has been relegated to the margins. Today, along with other individual techniques, and therefore more practical, psychoanalysis has abandoned its therapeutic aspect to jump right in personal development techniques. However, the continuing need for the analyst with the person to try to make it an impractical technique thus has lost ground to more modern and pragmatic theories such as the PAN or the NLP, which is perhaps less scientific but more adaptable to suit the person who has to use in their personal development.
Freud is the father of this doctrine from that released in 1890. The conceptual base which underpin its origins is the same as hypnosis, hypnosis unfortunately could not achieved in all cases but proved its worth in a series of clinical trials conducted by the French neurologist Jean Martin Charcot, Freud's teacher. In this way, psychoanalysis was a very useful alternative therapy in those clinical conditions which, by then, were called "hysterical." Hypnosis was a technique that quickly spread, but Freud never failed to dominate, however, his eagerness to results led him to experiment with other formulas to reach the subconscious of the individual as making the call daydream technique. For years he worked with different types of drugs that came to experience, even in his own body and also created a number of theories to interpret dreams. However, his most famous works, discussed the interpretation of sexuality hidden or denied and the superego.
The analyst allows his "patient" to speak freely and ensuring the maximum comfort in this. The free associations of ideas are the basis of a dialogue where the therapist intervenes only occasionally to facilitate the patient's verbal fluency. Freud was particularly interesting for the patient to talk about their dreams and their childhood, as in the first expressing the subconscious of the patient by the psychiatrist keys should be interpreted (as did your work "The Interpretation of Dreams") and the second, he said, were the main causes of any trauma.
Freud, in turn, outraged Viennese society with their theories completely overturned in the sexual sphere. In fact, some of his biographers, notes that this aspect was intentional, it could be one way to draw more attention really useful commercially, others argue that Sigmund himself had many sexual trauma that will persuade it to call attention to that area. A bit off topic will also talk about a possible addiction to various psychotropic drugs in play, but it seems more than demonstrated that her possible addiction due to their jobs came in search of a substance that could replace hypnosis (in which discipline was a disaster despite having had the best teacher.) In any case, those were different times.
When Freud died in 1939 with 83 years, psychoanalysis began to be accepted in the Germanic countries. Not so in the Axis countries where Hitler and Mussolini considered his teachings as dangerous and they came to burn all copies of their books. This predicament, far from sinking the theories of psychoanalysis, made these much more attractive. If someone like Hitler forbade it should be good at least that was the new view that acquired the public in the free countries. The momentum continued after the war. Interestingly, hypnotic techniques, more advanced and efficient, but much more complicated and in need of a type of very specific and preparations began to be put aside.
While psychoanalysis relies heavily on intuition and subjectivity of the therapist, hypnosis is much more direct. While psychoanalysis is limited to the conditions of the type called hysterical (hysterical paralysis) and neurotic (obsessive neurosis, paranoia simple phobias ...), hypnosis has a broader spectrum, with time, have found new applications.
The great reputation acquired psychoanalysis also has other culprits. Bright students from these extended techniques, perfected and established schools differential of Sigmund Freud: Wilhelm Reich, Melanie Klein, Wilfred Bion, Jacques Lacan, Otto Rank, Alfred Addler, Carl Jung (the latter created his own theories parallel) ...
Over the years they appeared new theories and new schools of psychoanalysis, but in the fifties, the opponents of psychoanalysis, through a series of clinical work demonstrated the low effectiveness of these techniques. Supporters initially refused those statistics, but new research confirms the evidence from the time the defense was to demonstrate that psychoanalysis and hypnosis, needs good specialists. He soon began to decline, however, the addition of movie stars to therapists who merely hearing the film industry itself, saved hard and deserved the situation. Thus
psychoanalysis had a certain prestige to the eighties of last century when a new series of studies again highlight psychoanalysis. The issue was more serious now because of the emergence of a large number of specific techniques and high-efficiency such as behavioral, gestalt, cognitive, etc., and alternated with drug therapies that enhance its effectiveness.
psychoanalysis undoubtedly mean a wonderful innovation in the times of cold water therapy, electroshock and lobotomies were a common practice, but as the seriousness and humanity of the new psychiatry reached the current situation, psychoanalysis is an obvious anachronism. With the death of Jacques Lacan in 1981 death of the last great champion of psychoanalysis as a science, however, still remains the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA), founded in 1910 under the auspices of the Freud and initial president of CG Jung had not dissented from the original line of the first. It was precisely this organization that in 1999, presented an elaborate study on the efficacy of psychoanalysis, but accepting the limitations on patient age, duration of therapy and usually minor issues related to the workplace. The study not only accepted these limitations, moreover, inherently, acknowledged the end to these therapies by refusing the comparison with other more in tune with the times. The study ended by recognizing that the psychoanalysis he needed more empirical work.
Anyway, psychoanalysis not dead and that new trends have emerged aimed at using this for the extension of self, but relegated to oblivion their aspirations as healing therapy. In this way, psychoanalysis has been moving away from its character as health science that aspired someday. However, despite the popular support it enjoyed for much of the twentieth century, it never helped him pass the smell test. First was the philosopher Karl Popper who showed his character in comparison with theories pseudoscience less accepted and seemingly more fickle and after theoretical heir, Adolf Grünbaum it applied to linear logic theories psychoanalytic to demonstrate its falsity (not A implies not B if C and D are possible). Today
API is still alive despite having more detractors than similar students. Their survival, despite this, not in play in a world where "divination", parapsychology and other pseudo-sciences are a good breeding ground.
For Spain, the English Society of Psychoanalysis (SEP) was founded in 1959 in a sweet moment for these techniques and when the Franco regime had long since ceased to view them with disfavor. Today
SEP psychoanalysts shape their own without going into any control system studies. If Sigmund Freud was a leading neurologist of his time, psychoanalysts today do not enjoy themselves, no academic degree accepted, unless they, individually, to obtain outside the scope of psychoanalysis on their own. As if the chaos and discredit these practices were not enough, since 1981 also have the Psychoanalytic Society of Madrid, with statutes and powers similar to English but apart from this and both are represented in the API, which does not happen English Association of the field Lacanian psychoanalysis. Today
Freud's books go on sale at newsstands, an issue each Monday. Books that bring us to learn from the late nineteenth and early twentieth giving us a wealth of knowledge, can also do the works of Albert Einstein. In both cases, their historical value is indisputable, but as work of the physicist still do not have large cracks product of time and the evolution of our knowledge, the work of neurologist has lost all consistency helped him to corner the Inhumane therapies antiquity.
Image from the web: www.biografiasyvidas.com
INITIAL NOTE: This text is intended as a study, something "light" on one of the basic laws of the offense written. Not intended to be a professional analysis on the subject empirically simply conclusions by the author ... "Osease me."
say "you can offend more than it wants," he also said that "whoever gets it follows, that I have even heard that" if you can. " For the two latter, on offense is a contradiction, but if relativize the issues, not are both.
Why would anyone be offended when you receive a critique harmful? Eye, which I do not mean harmless to offensive, but a brash and disrespectful.
to offend somebody has to do with the alleged offense, an attempt to destroy something that has some degree of illusion. In our particular case, most of those who write and publish here, do not rely too much on our quality, but would go on editor editor looking for an opportunity that would not hesitate to exploit, but we put forward, if not hope, in texts set forth. Our desire is to please, however, we are aware (I hope) that this is not always can be. On the other hand, most also expect a little help from whom we read, we want guidance on how to please them and also how to make fewer mistakes. The last thing we want is for someone to behave as "famosillos" Risto, with devastating and destructive criticism, but they were right, there are more than a vain boast of a bad critic who believes in possession of ultimate truth. Come on, it attacks the illusions of the author, most of jealousy that his only true wisdom because knowledge is the weak point as to where it hurts.
Well, I think I lost the clip, as they say, revenge, because all this is that I intend to illustrate, the closest thing we have, the meaning of harm and the method to achieve this.
All this is possible when the person you intended to offend, has a higher security level or places no illusion or vague hope in the matter at hand. Thus, an occasional offender would be without achieving its purpose.
For example, I remember a couple of years ago I met a former high school classmate and we talked. He told me that her friend had been coladita for me and I was very surprised that statement. Always remembered getting me for almost everything. At first bothered me, but over time it went dead. 'No. But it was a pretty girl and perhaps because of this, I returned the attacks. This ex-colleague recalled an episode that I had forgotten. Apparently one of those distant days when trying to impose their views on our working group, I compromised with their ideas and she came out of the pot. Both get angry, however, she had a very hard and I cried to her friend, is the one I found.
- It's horrible! - He said - I can not agree with him and he never attacked, is that I'm brighter than him, smarter, but it provoked and angry just me and him achieve ends to impose their views, but that's not what bothers me ... what bothers me is what you think of me.
What she had not stopped to think that I had taken his ideas and had become adapted to our needs, but such was his desire to dominate everything to the last detail that was only angry. But that was not the issue. The question was, again according to the friend who told me that at one point tried to really hurt me with his words and told me it was horrible ... yes, it sounds like. I said that I thought was very handsome, but it really was ugly, of course, contrary to what she expected, nor did I bother, I even told "I know, so what?". The reason, she could not understand is that I had never raised that could be beautiful and that she told me I was ugly heave brought me completely. His drama was that to other people who were not me, it had become clear that coladita for me was that I believed just the opposite and that was precisely his drama. In this example the conclusion that no one can pretend to be offended by something that already has taken or that does not really care. Of course it could also not be offended because the opinion of the person who practiced it, was not considered relevant or valid. This was not the case because when expressing that opinion in public if they affect the possibility that others sympathized with that view.
The other case is more difficult to demonstrate by way of example, when you have full confidence in its value could be the equivalent of one's opinion was valid to replace itself. Surely we have met many people of those we call "very smug," ie, they believe the absolute best and nothing can change their mind. But in this case, mistakes can be tragic perspective, nobody has the capacity to warn of a large bump that sooner or later have to take: the disappointment.
final conclusion: The offense affects liable only to the offense and it should interfere in one basic weakness is the lack of confidence in something or someone you have sustained a few illusions or hopes. Outside this area the offense loses its effectiveness.
Formerly the employer paid the employee in an envelope, utilities were forced to hire a collector who had to travel to your home to collect and all companies had customer service office closest to you so you should not spend money on travel or telephone calls. For your part, you were paying in cash, without generating financial costs or the seller or yourself (the letters were missing almost an exception.) When you navigated to a financial institution to open an account only you could provide interest, they wanted captarte at all costs. Even lend you money all were easy. Well, as today, the directors always asking you to prove you did not need the loan to podértelo give, that has not changed. But on this happy
bank that is to win something money, born a Machiavellian idea of \u200b\u200bdominating the world, if not more, to dominate our lives. Start by offering credit cards with no fees charged by 4% to the seller. At first, many sellers do not accept, but the tourist arrivals in hand with them were forced to accept, as a result, prices rose. Some offered stoop if you were paying the price in cash, others charge you 4% if you were paying by card. The bank found that a serious affront and went to court with the advantage of having the power of money. If the judges did not give them the reason, they could always make them change the law ... and they did. On the other hand these credit cards created heavy indebtedness in some families ended up getting rid of them was born and apparently less damaging other cards, and debit cards. At first debit cards had not commission, but that incident was linked to another bank at the time.
In the seventies, some foreign multinationals had forced employees to open a bank account to collect on it, in the eighties was generalized to domestic firms. Seemed advantageous because you had to carry the money over, but the bosses abandoned the weekly payment by the monthly interest they posed a retention of capital to their respective interests. In that time became common requests for advances by the workers. These borrowings were a great breeding ground for credit cards and personal loans, which benefited directly from the banks.
At the same time, utilities were the heavens opened and began to ask for account numbers to their clients to collect by bank draft, supposedly they took care of the cost of transfer as it saved the wages of collector. Along with these undertakings, others rushed to this form of recovery that gave security safer to get the money, if your account has remained in the red and charge you you pay the respective interests of the bank, there was no way to delay the payment a few days if the liquid money was about to arrive to you. The fence is closed.
One day we find that our money was totally virtual and was at the mercy of bank computers. That day the bank began its final blow. He began to charge fees for credit cards, by the fact that they charged us things directly to our account (when it was supposed to already charged), the maintenance of accounts, likewise, required to keep money in their circuits We reduced the minimum interest. To achieve the target agreed with the authorities who were given our data so that we attach when necessary (for them). Now you get paid for every letter we sent, usually filled with its own advertising, and had no return payments made to us, even though they were not allowed to descontárnoslos. If you steal credit card or debit card are not responsible and is worse than when they had the money on, is not limited, at least for the chorizo. We have to pay and shut up.
But the last and has no name. Now, if you do not use credit cards, they send you home a Gold VISA (limit 6000 €) by mail and you just have activated a call. If you come into the hands of another person without scruples 're ready.
If we pay a maintenance fee for our accounts is logical that we have control over them. But, as we are seeing is not so. The average citizen has unprotected virtual money. It is as if our money were sheep and the banker, who is a true wolf in economic issues, was the only pastor approved of our animals ... poor things! Today
banks have emerged that claim not to charge you some of those costs for services you did not ask in their day and you had to take, but how long they last. Mere tricks of competition that we should not hesitate to take advantage, but demonstrate the logic of what say. It would be better than imposed by law.
It is possible that banks can not "survive" (the quotes are by the irony) without paying the little things. In that case, the law should allocate those costs among those who have been forced to generate. The utilities (water, gas, electricity, telephone ...) on your bill should have a fixed discount fee that covers maintenance of accounts (including mail, possible refunds, transfers ...). If a month does not have to charge us anything (with the least-they have invented is difficult) should continue to return the fee. This would also be very useful with telecommunication companies which tend to make up invoices undue blanket.
respect to payroll debit the same: the company must pay an extra payroll debit because it is who you really save money by not decanting liquid.
regard to credit and debit cards, the only beneficiaries are the financial companies, and must therefore disappear quotas on these wretched cards.
Everything else is stealing our daily. Please allow us to take our money under the mattress, should be compensated for it. And do not be fooled when they say you are free to do whatever they want with their money, try it and see the amount of euros that are on the road.
Or is it literature or science or silent one.
José Ortega y Gasset
"Literature or Science? Miles
sperm begin their titanic struggle, the race for the egg to fertilize, but only one, hopefully, find the entrance to the temple of fertility. Lost, for this, and within its flagellum and travel in the interior of the female gonad, the final stretch toward the altar there is the nucleus and its genetic materials are mixed to form the double helix of DNA, the information to define a new being.
Science or literature?
Emerging from the distant Oort cloud, in seventy-five, is making headway in the solar system, a huge mass of ice and other substances which we know by the name of Comet Halley. On his last visit, while the sun warmed the surface and the solar wind combed his hair eyéctil along thousands of miles to our visual delight, you are bombarded with probes to extract their last secrets. Some managed to open the flower part of his secret, but others were lost in its icy depths or darkness of space. After "Halley" returned to his rest beyond the planetoid known to sleep last another seventy-five, when it gives us another opportunity to win their intimacies.
"Literature or Science?
ADHD (Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity), according to recent studies, is present in its most visible, in approximately 7% of children, being more common in boys than in girls. However, New studies suggest that the percentage may be even greater. Because until about twenty years ago, had not taken account of this disorder, suggests that the number of affected may be increasing in every generation. On the other hand, the study of this problem, the prison population to believe otherwise. There has been discovered that in some cases, ADHD is present in more than 50% of the prison population. Among subjects with methylphenidate treatment reduced the rate of recidivism in the crime. This high prison population with ADHD shows that, since they too were children, the percentages were already present in current generation earlier, just missing relevant studies to prove it.
Science or literature?
Science has always been surrounded by seas of doubt. At first the scientists were treated, for better and for worse, as magicians, in fact some behaved as such. However, nowadays there are few published protocols and stringent verification to ensure the validity of the findings, but despite how demanding the scientific world still, from time to time, producing sonadísimos fraud. Remember Atapuerca fraud, where someone mixed the jaw of a horse with the skull of a hominid to invent the missing link eternal ... that fraud was about to spoil the results of a field that, ultimately, has proved a very fruitful. Another singular case of fraud was the "cold fusion" that for several years in the eighties of last century, thousands of pages dirtied the world press.
But a few frauds can not take away our confidence in the scientists that every day, their work, prepare our future.
"Literature or Science?
I have never liked the dogmas of faith and Don José Ortega y Gasset was very prone to them. Science, literature or anything, and among the many choices gray is not an option. It is a pity that today, after it rains a lot of literature and make many umbrella of science, still read many quotes from this great man who sometimes hit, but others also failed. Because to err is human, and Don José was not God.
Don Jose, if their errors were not science should be literature ... or maybe you'd better shut up, but then ... then we would have lost their successes.
Moral: even the dogmas of faith should be consulted.
FINAL NOTE: I still believe that science and literature are compatible. For when the fair valuation As the popularization of science in our country ..
The image is taken from one of the many website's that are in English on popular science and science fiction and that there no one accused of nerd.
The Middle Ages is so named because it disappeared numerous documents, many cultural trends banned accused of paganism and others were taken by Christian obscurantism that devastated the West. As result that there was a dull time that has transcended the material enough to know thoroughly. Most of the works that deal eventually extrapolate that time events to give an idea of \u200b\u200breality, and many of the most interesting events of that time come to us as myths, legends and realities disrupted, resulting mostly from the transmission oral mouth. Thus born the stories of knights and characters totally mystified as King Arthur, El Cid, Richard the Lionheart, Robin Hood, James (the apostle warrior), Pelayo, Roland, Lancelot, Merlin ... there were some other, perhaps are the result of the need to unleash the imagination. In the West, the books were censored and imprisoned in monasteries where the monks were almost exclusively the only ones able to read them.
Gutenberg and his printing press marked the true end of the Middle Ages. Since then the books become simpler and the ideas cornered at last, the Dark Ages. Birth to new versions of the facts that allow us to compare and draw our own conclusion, our problem will be finding the good, as each story depends on who the count, but a thorough and appropriate study will allow us to get very close to reality.
Nowadays the problem lies elsewhere. The information is not needed, but hide it not that hard, just a matter of unsubstantiated information flood, false and contradictory to hide the truth and knowledge impossible. In these affaires involving the media. These same media, which unfortunately are always partisan, instructed his readers in the direction of ideas that suits them best, thus the existence of excessive media prefers a particular orientation of the country's political orientation. In our country, as in most, the further to the right is a political party supported by the media is, see as the PP is supported by ABC, La Razón, COPE, Onda Cero, El Mundo, A3, Digital Freedom ... and about 80% of the media, the PSOE is supported by El País, Cadena SER ... about 12% of the media. The rest of the media support other parties following the rule left over less support. This explains the shift to the right of the votes compared to what would be expected in every election, voters are influenced. We
Internet is where the power set of means and banks (which we'll discuss another day), toss tablespoon. In The Red truly free spirits, not by name, attempt to report and disseminate new views as opposed to established media and more importantly, hidden aspects of everyday reality. However, the great flood of information sponsored by conventional means, try to eat up these sources of free information.
And now someone will say: "What?" Sticking
Another: "This is a literary website, not a web information or opinion"
Both deserve an answer ... they are right and not have it, because literature is understood to mean very complicated ... and if not just ask Gutenberg. The first thing printed, so the story goes, was the Bible ... Is the Bible literature? Finally
leave a question for each one answer: What difference written information from the literature?
What really differentiates us from other apes and other animals was our thumb. When the thumb got close on the other four fingers changed the planet's history. Something as simple as that put the heirs of a specimen in the way of world domination.
is possible that the first Australopithecus had a brain not too differentiated from other great apes. It is also possible that these and inherit his thumb from an earlier ape, but the point is that at the dawn of mankind the change occurred and that a stone was no longer a simple stone and a stick is no longer a simple stick and became extensions and extensions of the body of the little apes and increasing the virtual size.
The appearance of the thumb would have three important evolutionary consequences:
- The greater tendency to stand up on its two hind legs to free her hands.
- Growth of the cranial cavity to house the new manual skills.
- Increase of myopia to look closely and make better tools.
may group structures present in almost all the apes, were already present in the first proto and it certainly facilitated the evolutionary success, since it allowed the specialization of some of their individuals.
Along with the development of weapons and tools, the breakthrough that allowed evolutionary another milestone was the use of containers. At first large-leaved plant, then animal skins, used to transport the collected from greater distances, leaving animals without food around human habitation. An environment without food became a security area without herbivores, carnivores had not. Besides that allowed communities to store food for times worse and they invented conservation techniques such as drying and smoking fire also.
humanoid beings, with every advance, freeing up time that could be used to carefully observe their surroundings. But according to some authors, it must be emphasized that gave him the advantage over other species, facilitating their more carnivorous diet made and increasing protein intake, which, according to a complicated explanation, provided chemically, its evolution and very soon, that little monkey, became the most fearsome predators.
When belittles the best-sellers are always trying to say that this is not literature, but then what is literature? It turns out that after the cold dictionary definitions do not exclude any way to this kind of "literature", the experts can not agree on the true definition of literature. The fact is that there is a jurisdiction that can say this is literature and it is not. However, most definitions include the idea that literature is the art of writing. As with the term literature the term itself is not truly define art, but we accept that art is what you do with it and will therefore if one says that making art is making art, the quality of this art and we will at a later time so, literature is everything that is done with the intention of making art.
We have defined the vast majority of best-sellers such as literature, now let's talk about your quality as such. To do this we must define the parameters of quality of literature and it is infinitely difficult. If the experts could not agree to define what literature was graded to create borders on the impossible. So only the valuation of each player is good. But it happens in literature as in everything, what many want to know the value of a work before reading it, however, the assessment some critics or others may be more or less close to our tastes, so we must also experience the value of these and become critics of the critics to ignore those literary works which can only be wasting our time.
Yes ... wasting time. For the next point is what gives us a literary work, pleasure, culture, technical knowledge, ability to think, feelings, information vacuous, boring ... Perhaps, when assessing any text should take into account these values.
remember a poster in the now-defunct neighborhood of "La Perona" saying
PINCHAUBAS SAREGLAN
THE UMBRELLA TRUST NEL
PINCHAUGAS
VARATO
The text provided information, however, how the same could also define the reader that made use of it. Because of its location, each day I read a hundred new people from media. Throughout the more than two years he was placed could read about sixty thousand people, making it a real best-seller. Perhaps for the Pinch-grapes, who could not even write your nickname, that poster was a work of art and text, the world's smartest, a la par que el más largo que había escrito nunca… era literatura y según aquellas premisas era la mejor literatura posible. Vilipendiarlo parece fácil y, sin embargo, es un gran error.
Quién no ha escuchado en radio o televisión una de esas tertulias de estirados escritores, donde se alaba un tipo de obras y se crítica otras. La pedantería del tertuliano le lleva hacer una exagerada defensa de lo que él cree clásicos contemporáneos, en ocasiones meros tochos somníferos plagados de murallas formadas por aburridas frases y ampulosas palabras, como si con esa defensa su propia obra se impregnara del valor que el da a esos autores. Por otro lado, se ataca en un discurso exageradamente negativo a obras of commercial success, more than any of the pundits have, with accusations that we all know. Obviate the art to get the reader interested and to inject what he wants, refusing to accept that perhaps this is the new literature.
Literature must reach the reader and that I learned, or should do, one of those writers known gathering that approached to the house of the Click-grapes to ask him to rectify the poster.
- Ujté Meho can cel-lo? "I said laughing Bugs-grapes -.
Given the lofty affirmation of the Bohemian writer will give the same tools he had used to make the first cartel and the writer took the bait. When it was finished said
- Mu ... well payo o er ensima cuegalo mine, go al'otra wax and parallel.
Both crossed the street and looked at the posters and as the old man read perfectly with misspellings, the new, with the stroke too thin and the letters too close together in just two lines, was completely unreadable.
- Y aluego payos c'hasen litiritura DISEN loh.
Where, how, when, why ... these questions, an obligatory response, was the basis of journalism a few years ago, curiously, in the same time, when the article was done had to pass through a filter called censorship. When censorship journalists disappeared more or less glory saw heaven opened to launch the assault and the result of this, appeared in court, endless lists of complaints for libel and the like. Today, we do not know what product or the lobby's of the press, the journalist meets with one question and that goes to your editor: WHAT?
's funny to talk about the investigative journalism when the news are born in the newsroom and the reporter out to the streets to find facts to substantiate his article, the journalist does not work as a researcher who tries to unravel the truth more or less objective, instead it behaves as an attorney collecting data to give force to his thesis.
But since the actual press is limited to extend a certain line of thought, must be the reader who heroically raised those questions, but the essential of all, once read an article is: WHY?
remember a teacher who, years ago, before the deterioration of journalistic values, advised us to read several newspapers in different trends for a more rational idea of \u200b\u200btheir own news.
Who else, who knows less and trends of each media outlet, so the question "why?" Can give us a fair idea of \u200b\u200bthe reality of the news. The question allows us to discard the rhetoric arbitrary and complementation with another counter-trend reading help us fill in the gaps of the story.
Our living environment is our first step to understanding the world, if we fall in this first objective of knowledge will never reach the "why?" S "higher universe, because nobody ever built a building without putting a first stone well supported and the other on this as firm y. ..
We must never, in general, accept the opinions of others without asking us the big question, but much less accepted as the authoritative information that we compared ourselves. The reality is quite dark and closing their eyes and blindly believe what they tell us.
The universe is dark as an open question, almost all are invented may be valid, but very few can be certain.
Descartes wanted to start his philosophy from scratch. According to him, they were entirely demolished all existing structures because, he said, were in ruins. This could create a new building based on reason from its foundations.
"Cogito ergo sum"
And this was his first stone: "I think therefore I am "...
After the first stone was stuck in a dead end, but would not accept that without the reality of their senses, experience, could not leave him, and unwittingly grabbed one of the beams of the building demolished, without assessing their state, and continued building.
Perfection ... something that others had already defined as an arbitrary language over two hundred years ago (Occam) and now Descartes revived into something like San Anselmo evidence to prove the existence of God.
If Descartes, to reach this point, I asked: "Why?", The building could not continue this way. Since he had inadvertently reintroduced the world of Plato's ideas ... his building began to be constructed with materials demolition and had not even asked about the status of these materials.
Descartes was the genius who knew how to tear down the building of philosophy and knew how to put a foundation stone, but was unable to make the most important question to which you should try to answer a philosopher: "Why?".
If any reason should be supported by the existence of God, why do we have to bother doing philosophy if you have the Bible? On the other hand, if you only know the self, where we are all terms used to define the perception and why language is used as the basis for the definition if your time has not been defined?
In his posthumous book "Thousands and thousands of millions," Carl Segan, insisted on what our perception is limited compared to the universe, we did see the huge numbers who moved to us, insignificant human. So why someone might think that the only language tool you can define the universe?
Our daily experience puts us in touch with the universe, a very small, infinitesimal, but reveals little by little the human nature ... when you just need to go picking up the pieces that the universe gives every day to find the answers to your questions, if our species is patient and able to survive their own ignorance, one day find the answer to every "why?" s ".
The Universe is dark as an open question, almost all are invented are valid, but very few will be true.
Do we have to think of humans as only heirs of the universe and imagine the Earth as an oasis in the vastness of the Cosmos ?
Why?
We may not be as lonely as it seems and perhaps the apparent barrenness of the vast infinity no more than a partial view imposed by our human condition.
Who knows if this moment will not be watching, from afar, up close, from another dimension or from our inner selves, other beings unknown to us.
Consider for a moment that there are intelligent aliens Could it be that they were disembodied and could survive in the most hostile to the empty space around us? If humans have so readily accepted the existence of the soul for centuries why not accept these things without good or bad connotations?
are too many questions and just have the human story in response. A story that demonstrates the desire of our species to justify selfishness, while these beings do not serve as justification for anyone, not gods or demons, only expectant souls.
but now imprudently not think we are the only observed and, to be fair, let other species that, elsewhere, are, as we observed.
If it is true that we have an immortal soul after death will we know if all that exists, like so many other things we've been told. But if there is no soul or is it concluded with our death, nothing imported and may only be a mental game for human living.
The Universe is dark as an open question, almost all are invented are valid, but very few will be true.