Running Shoes Heavy Runner

A TAX THAT WE DO NOT MOVE ... Ronald

- For yesterday (20 February) came to the District Attorney Angasmarca Santiago de Chuco, with the aim of resolving the problem that we all know.

- After a single reception from council members and residents of our district began the conversation led by the leading authorities of our community, including: Governor Hebri Ramos, Judge Ylde Pereda PNP representatives, presidents of the villages and citizens of Angasmarca.

- Since the prosecutor gave started his speech by noticed the favoritism toward Mr. Diogenes has Geldres, warning the population to be involved in this fight could end up in jail because the law authorizes the Mayor, but the council put their voice of protest stating that the board not only as Mayor but also shapes the policy-makers.
Apparently, the prosecutor's words with a threatening tone intimidate the community thought however what was achieved was to reinforce our goal but not intimidate us and that was his main objective


People hearing the threatening words and ironic suggestions by the prosecutor to open the city and stop accusing Geldres Diogenes began to express discontent against the prosecutor and of course to make his total rejection of the mayor. On the other hand, the presidents of the villages unanimously expressed their disagreement with the administration of Mayor making clear they do not want her back, that way it became clear that what was said by Diogenes Geldres in the media is totally false since reality is not as he claims (that 70% of the population approves of his return and only a minimal set, is against). Also requested the opening of the civil registries thing that the prosecutor responded that this service will only be opened if he returns the mayor.

- As the prosecutor himself hinted, now we all know who is in favor of the mayor, so we will continue to stand up to high-level authorities are interested in this problem is for 3 months, plus one authority can not take the decision to open the city and bring back the mayor in an arbitrary manner.

- We are preparing another strategy to end this never ending and we reiterate our commitment not to go back to the end because DIOGENES GELDRES, it will not hold the office of mayor, at least in our district does not I will do.

- From Angasmarca Angasmarca ON LINE ... reports to support the Committee for the Defense of the Interests of the District.

Body Heat Detection Circuit

___________________::::::::::::::_____________________

unpublished photographs of Angasmarca

-----------------------( Click HERE and discover the story in pictures )---------------------- Angasmarca

Disney Light Up Canopy Bed

Llauró gives us his opinion: THE LAST DAYS OF CORRUPTION

On 7 December 2008, the population of Angasmarca conjunction with the "Committee to Defend the Interests of Angasmarca (CODI) local municipal took a peaceful and democratic way - making this popular resentment, the same that is unprecedented in other towns, such as mayors, do not do any good - in that sense, it is outrageous that when you take a local without violence to assert the interests of the people, certain officials appointed to resolve disputes, state that is an illegal, when it, in our country is not the only case. In no way can support because it is a threat to the people to desist from the claims, then have the mayor come back and everything is as if nothing had happened. Along these lines, the people, regarding the meeting of 23 of January this year, expressed his dissatisfaction with the actions made by some representatives inadvertently, who have been convinced, by an agreement that seeks to subject to legal procedures and mechanisms that threaten late people's welfare.

The mediation board, all you have shown is their inefficiency in solving problems, for example, we have Mr. Congressman Elijah Rodriguez Zavaleta and advises on issues of conflict of PCM. That seems quite the contrary, that the welfare of the people is changed for political favors and interests involved, and that is what angers people because apparently clear legal technicalities, which sample is a threat to the defense of the interests of Angasmarca.

these lines, you can not threaten people in a subtle and less to CODIA and people (the majority), letting them know that it is an illegal, and moreover it is intended to denounce the representatives of this Committee and so afraid. Let us recall once again that we are in a democratic and social state of law, the same as guaranteed by our Constitution, understood as people's interests prevail over individual interests.

Finally, the competent authorities as the National Election Board and the Comptroller must see that democracy means that power emanates from the people and that is the support of municipal elections. Likewise, representative democracy does not only imply that the mayor is the only elected representative, but also policy makers, who in their duties, are responsible for controlling and monitoring among others, the actions of the mayor. That is democracy, however, what happens when a mayor has the support of their rulers? The closest thing is that it is no longer a democracy but a dictatorship, because there is no control, supervision and filters to make healthy management. In summary, the board of aldermen, functions as a small conference that is where you control the actions of the mayor. That is also

the reason for the Congress, as "the mirror of political society. In this sense we can understand the idea of \u200b\u200brepresentation as the reproduction of the characteristics of the subjects represented or, put another way, like the portrait of the profiles of these. In this direction can be thought of the parliament as a microcosm of the body politic "

Therefore," the representative institution par excellence for any sector or policy option is excluded in the case is strong enough to access it "

Consequently, what if the rulers are against the Mayor for the continued irregularities and mismanagement that has developed vertically, without taking into account the council members and the people? This is the reality we live Angasmarca, the 5 council office have available and do not support the administration of Mayor and together with the people reject his management and continuity against the municipality, that is the reason why is taken by the local municipality, to enforce their rights against the indifference of the authorities until today are acting without the utmost seriousness in providing solutions to our interests, given the allegations of nepotism, theft of checks, works awarded in a wrong way, among others.

So what should the National Election Board is to give his opinion that is vital and essential to create mechanisms and procedures to restore an election process in our town.

The Organic Law of Municipalities and the mediation committee set no more solutions and can only send us to the Constitution.

is an extreme case that requires the presence of the JNE to restore democracy with substantial changes, and will not be allowed to question the mayor without support from the people and rulers. RONALD

Llaurado.