+de+DSC00694.JPG.jpg)
On 7 December 2008, the population of Angasmarca conjunction with the "Committee to Defend the Interests of Angasmarca (CODI) local municipal took a peaceful and democratic way - making this popular resentment, the same that is unprecedented in other towns, such as mayors, do not do any good - in that sense, it is outrageous that when you take a local without violence to assert the interests of the people, certain officials appointed to resolve disputes, state that is an illegal, when it, in our country is not the only case. In no way can support because it is a threat to the people to desist from the claims, then have the mayor come back and everything is as if nothing had happened. Along these lines, the people, regarding the meeting of 23 of January this year, expressed his dissatisfaction with the actions made by some representatives inadvertently, who have been convinced, by an agreement that seeks to subject to legal procedures and mechanisms that threaten late people's welfare.
The mediation board, all you have shown is their inefficiency in solving problems, for example, we have Mr. Congressman Elijah Rodriguez Zavaleta and advises on issues of conflict of PCM. That seems quite the contrary, that the welfare of the people is changed for political favors and interests involved, and that is what angers people because apparently clear legal technicalities, which sample is a threat to the defense of the interests of Angasmarca.
these lines, you can not threaten people in a subtle and less to CODIA and people (the majority), letting them know that it is an illegal, and moreover it is intended to denounce the representatives of this Committee and so afraid. Let us recall once again that we are in a democratic and social state of law, the same as guaranteed by our Constitution, understood as people's interests prevail over individual interests.
Finally, the competent authorities as the National Election Board and the Comptroller must see that democracy means that power emanates from the people and that is the support of municipal elections. Likewise, representative democracy does not only imply that the mayor is the only elected representative, but also policy makers, who in their duties, are responsible for controlling and monitoring among others, the actions of the mayor. That is democracy, however, what happens when a mayor has the support of their rulers? The closest thing is that it is no longer a democracy but a dictatorship, because there is no control, supervision and filters to make healthy management. In summary, the board of aldermen, functions as a small conference that is where you control the actions of the mayor. That is also
the reason for the Congress, as "the mirror of political society. In this sense we can understand the idea of \u200b\u200brepresentation as the reproduction of the characteristics of the subjects represented or, put another way, like the portrait of the profiles of these. In this direction can be thought of the parliament as a microcosm of the body politic "
Therefore," the representative institution par excellence for any sector or policy option is excluded in the case is strong enough to access it "
Consequently, what if the rulers are against the Mayor for the continued irregularities and mismanagement that has developed vertically, without taking into account the council members and the people? This is the reality we live Angasmarca, the 5 council office have available and do not support the administration of Mayor and together with the people reject his management and continuity against the municipality, that is the reason why is taken by the local municipality, to enforce their rights against the indifference of the authorities until today are acting without the utmost seriousness in providing solutions to our interests, given the allegations of nepotism, theft of checks, works awarded in a wrong way, among others.
So what should the National Election Board is to give his opinion that is vital and essential to create mechanisms and procedures to restore an election process in our town.
The Organic Law of Municipalities and the mediation committee set no more solutions and can only send us to the Constitution.
is an extreme case that requires the presence of the JNE to restore democracy with substantial changes, and will not be allowed to question the mayor without support from the people and rulers. RONALD
The mediation board, all you have shown is their inefficiency in solving problems, for example, we have Mr. Congressman Elijah Rodriguez Zavaleta and advises on issues of conflict of PCM. That seems quite the contrary, that the welfare of the people is changed for political favors and interests involved, and that is what angers people because apparently clear legal technicalities, which sample is a threat to the defense of the interests of Angasmarca.
these lines, you can not threaten people in a subtle and less to CODIA and people (the majority), letting them know that it is an illegal, and moreover it is intended to denounce the representatives of this Committee and so afraid. Let us recall once again that we are in a democratic and social state of law, the same as guaranteed by our Constitution, understood as people's interests prevail over individual interests.
Finally, the competent authorities as the National Election Board and the Comptroller must see that democracy means that power emanates from the people and that is the support of municipal elections. Likewise, representative democracy does not only imply that the mayor is the only elected representative, but also policy makers, who in their duties, are responsible for controlling and monitoring among others, the actions of the mayor. That is democracy, however, what happens when a mayor has the support of their rulers? The closest thing is that it is no longer a democracy but a dictatorship, because there is no control, supervision and filters to make healthy management. In summary, the board of aldermen, functions as a small conference that is where you control the actions of the mayor. That is also
the reason for the Congress, as "the mirror of political society. In this sense we can understand the idea of \u200b\u200brepresentation as the reproduction of the characteristics of the subjects represented or, put another way, like the portrait of the profiles of these. In this direction can be thought of the parliament as a microcosm of the body politic "
Therefore," the representative institution par excellence for any sector or policy option is excluded in the case is strong enough to access it "
Consequently, what if the rulers are against the Mayor for the continued irregularities and mismanagement that has developed vertically, without taking into account the council members and the people? This is the reality we live Angasmarca, the 5 council office have available and do not support the administration of Mayor and together with the people reject his management and continuity against the municipality, that is the reason why is taken by the local municipality, to enforce their rights against the indifference of the authorities until today are acting without the utmost seriousness in providing solutions to our interests, given the allegations of nepotism, theft of checks, works awarded in a wrong way, among others.
So what should the National Election Board is to give his opinion that is vital and essential to create mechanisms and procedures to restore an election process in our town.
The Organic Law of Municipalities and the mediation committee set no more solutions and can only send us to the Constitution.
is an extreme case that requires the presence of the JNE to restore democracy with substantial changes, and will not be allowed to question the mayor without support from the people and rulers. RONALD
Llaurado.
0 comments:
Post a Comment